2012年10月30日 星期二
黄仕平助取回遭扣押外國保健品
黃仕平州議員取回六罐保健品,旁為劉女士,張仕生與陳利發特別助理。
由澳洲購買六罐保健品被亞庇稅關局扣押經 黃仕平州議員交涉後得以取回。
黃仕平州議員吁旅遊者外地購物應小心謹慎以免因觸犯法令被扣押。
他也籲請一些社團主辦有關外地旅遊應注意事宜,尤其在購物方面知識講座以便市民對此有更深一層瞭解。
據表示,劉女士(60歲)因日前偕同朋友到澳洲旅遊而在該地購買了六罐Omega 3保健品未料 在亞庇稅關局扣押,其理由為未註冊及大量購買。
黃仕平州議員在交涉為了瞭解之故要求對方出示觸犯法律的條文。
該條文中其中一條文可以寬容物品只允許一個月內用完,針對此事,黃仕平也與對方進行反駁,最終黃氏表示若不得要領則只有交上法庭進行定奪而對方才將物品交出解決此事。
他說,市民旅遊多少為了送禮之故購買一些物品回來,為何連保健品也要扣押。
他稱,當時扣押時,他們曾說不如倒入垃圾桶又不允許,在外國通常如此做,若如此,稅關局沒收後疑自己用多過毀掉。
他籲請亞庇稅關局及藥劑部門在扣押這些物品時要摸摸良心勿濫權。
他稱,為何洗黑錢,毒品看不到,這些小事偏偏遭受扣押,大事不去做。
他奉勸旅遊者在購買衣服時應將之拆開放入行李箱勿包裝以免被沒收,曾經有些人在外國帶十件衣服回來而被沒收。
稅關局人員尚說,為何這些保健品在這裡有得買而要到外國買回來?其實外國可能有更好的素質而這都是國陣反對黨壟斷這些保健品之故,也不失為官僚作風。
他建議社團與有關部門進行聯辦類似講座會以便讓市民瞭解在外國那些可以購買及不可購買,購買數量多少以及瞭解相關法律以免市民在不知情下物品被扣押蒙受財物損失。
陳利發震驚洪連輝刁難黄任平言論
沙巴民主行動黨斯裡丹絨州議員特別助理陳利發
沙巴民主行動黨斯裡丹絨州議員特別助理陳利發表示,他對團結黨的洪連輝的言論感到十分震驚和遺憾。他說,洪連輝不但沒有質問上司(首長慕沙)的貪污問題,反而欲追究斯裡丹絨區州議員黃仕平並沒有在議會中帶出斗湖的民生問題,這是非常讓人震驚的!
陳利發是針對昨日黃仕平被趕出州議會的新聞,斯裡丹絨區團結黨的洪連輝竟發言刁難黃仕平沒有為斗湖說出民生問題,作出上述聲明。他指出,黃仕平有譴責州政府與其花4700萬建一條馬路銜接到Balung的Sipadan Mangrove Resort,也不願做好惠及斗湖發展的海濱大道,並促請州政府給予交代。此外,針對民生問題,黃仕平也透過書面問答環節獲得斗湖民生的一些資訊。
他抨擊洪連輝身為人民發展領袖不應撒謊,對黃仕平的竭盡全力為人民發聲視而不見,反而想要撈政治利益,簡直就是道德淪喪!
同時,他也譴責洪連輝對首席部長慕沙阿曼的貪污課題視而不見,並挑戰他對慕沙的貪污指控作出表態!
他續稱,當天的議會是針對州財政預算案辯論,因此,黃仕平才會針對提及的斗湖公路問題以及首長掌握過多的預算問題提出質問,不料因提起慕沙掌控太多的預算,容易導致貪污而被趕出州議會。這是不符合民主精神的,尤其是在議會裡。
他說,洪連輝並沒有捍衛議會民主的基本原則,反而冷眼嘲諷,試問這就是國陣的人民發展領袖的素質嗎?況且,真難想像洪聯輝要辯論財政預算案時竟然鼓勵文不對題的亂講。
他指出,一切的民生問題皆因貪污和舞弊引起,若不解決根本的問題,民生問題十年如一日,並不會得到根本的解決。民生問題乃牽扯到政府工程頒發,以及政府官員監督和計劃的程序,一旦這個政府都涉及貪污,尋租行徑依然從不間斷。政府的工程和招標比市價貴了幾倍,這種種貪污問題若沒有得到解決,全沙巴乃至馬來西亞的民生問題將不會停止。
因此,他希望洪連輝不要蒙昧良心,在此課題上撈取廉價的政治宣傳,這對他一點幫助也沒有。同時,他也促請洪連輝敢敢向國陣領袖施壓,要國陣向人民交代,近來種種的貪污指控做何表態!
陳利發強調,議會殿堂是民生問題乃至家國大小事的論政平台。黃仕平身為沙巴民主行動黨唯一一名州議會代表,以及反對黨代議士,有責任將斗湖的問題乃至全州課題帶上議會辯論,力求做到絕對的制衡和監督,而不是簡單地問問哪裡水溝或馬路崩壞,卻對州政府涉及的嚴重貪污問題視而不見,這是本末倒置的!
「若一名領袖貪污,即使有再好的民生服務也是徒然」陳利發表示,如今沙巴州議會的民主已死,黃仕平有責任為全沙巴人民挺身而出,捍衛沙巴人言論和監督政府的基本權利。
他最後表示,當斗湖巴剎水災時,他連同黃仕平和陳泓縑第一時間到場巡視,試問團結黨在哪裡?他勸請洪連輝在對的時間做對的事,而不是想盡辦法如何刁難反對黨,卻忘了自己是政府的一份子,做不好事情是責無旁貸!
2012年10月24日 星期三
黄仕平議會致詞
Dewan Undangan Negeri Ke 13
Mesyuarat Ketiga
Penggal Ke 5
19 Okt 2012- 25 Okt 2012
Speech by:
YB Wong Sze Phin @ Jimmy ADUN N.57 Sri Tanjong
Tuan Speaker
Terima kasih kerana memberi saya peluang untuk membahaskan Pembentangan Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan (2013) yang disampaikan oleh Yang Amat Berhormat Ketua Menteri pada 19 Oktober 2012.
Salam Bersih, Salam Ubah dan salam bersidang kepada semua Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri Sabah. Ini kalilah.
Tuan Speaker
Saya akan membaca ucapan saya dalam Bahasa Inggeris.
Tuan Speaker,
Before I begin my debate on the proposed State Budget 2013, I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate our Chief Minister YAB Datuk Seri Musa Aman. He is the best ever Chief Minister since BN took control of the Sabah state government in 1994 for two reasons.
1. The Sabah Development Corridor (SDC) has achieved its best performance by receiving RM10 billion in the first half of this year, the highest amount of private investments among all the states in Malaysia.
2. Sabah has yet again earned praise from Auditor-General Tan Sri Ambrin Buang for demonstrating sound financial management in 2011 in terms of maintaining its record of efficient and prudent financial management over the past few years.
But at the same time, I cannot help but feel sorry for our CM. After doing such a good job for the state of Sabah, his approval rating among the rakyat has droped from 60% to only 45%, according to the latest polls by Merdeka Center earlier this month. This means that less than half of all Sabahans approve of his performance despite the heavy drumming up of his many achievements in the mainstream media.
CM Datuk Musa, if I was in your position, I would immediately dissolve the state assembly and call for the state elections to prove that a majority of Sabahans still support your leadership. There is no need to wait for Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib, to decide when to call the next general election. Our dear CM, I hereby challenge you to dissolve the state assembly after the tabling of this budget in order to prove your reputation is the best ever CM of Sabah!
However, I don't think you dare accept my challenge. You are still dreaming and placing false hopes on this newly tabled, so called the best ever budget, to regain the support from the people. For now, we bring the focus back on the budget which you tabled last Friday.
What is about BN state budget?
The CM cum Minister of Finance in his budget speech said Sabah is grateful to Federal Government for the allocation for Sabah. In fact, I feel nothing to be grateful about, due to the very fact that 2013 Federal Budget is one of the worst for Sabah in the last 10 years, receiving only RM3 billion which is 6.5% out of total development expenditure, whereas our population is 11.6% of this country’s population.
CM’s logic that there is a lot of development or that Sabahans have benefitted just because he has been and is going to spend large amount of the state money or how quickly he can spend it! This is all worng!!! Most of the money in previous budgets has produced little benefit for the people of Sabah. Judging from the poor records of the BN Sabah government, Pakatan is confident that the 2013 state budget will have nothing to shout about.
......Bad management and corruption have continued to keep many Sabahan’s under the poverty line.
Sabah is still the poorest state in Malaysia, hundreds of thousands of Sabahans are working in poorly paid jobs in the Klang Valley, Johor and Penang. Poverty can be seen everywhere within 5km from the centre of Kota Kinabalu! Datuk CM’s own constituency has many poverty stricken Sabahans! What have all the so called good budgets of Datuk Musa done for his own constituents?
Datuk Musa has made too many boosts on the comments from the Auditor General. Behind the façade of so called good management of certain departments, he needs to be reminded of the rampant corruption, deep rooted poverty, bad delivery service, high cost of living and---- his inability to abolish the Cabotage Policy.
Auditor General Report on Sabah concerning old folks home where residents at these homes were sleeping with mosquitoes, bathing with cold water, not fed beyond 5pm and made to eat food that they could not chew or were bad for them. Is this the practice of a government who claim ----“Rakyat didahulukan?”
Therefore, the few departments that have received praises from the Auditor General have done nothing for Sabahans.
--**-Failed Objectives and No Strategy-**
Sabah is an under developed state. We need to improve our very outdated and inadequate infrastructure. Some BN politicians have said, I won Sri Tanjung with the help of the incompetent SESB, Jabatan Air, JKR and Majlis Perbandaran Tawau. Yes, this is indeed true.
What has government done in this regard? Of the 6 objectives of this and previous budgets, the Sabah Bn government, 5 have failed to miserably:
1. Improve infrastructure – Sabah still has the worst;
2. Acceleration of achievement of Halatuju – no result as the 2012/2013 Economic Report pointed out, the cumulative committed investment from launch date of the SDC until end of June this year is RM112.0 billion but the actual realised investment amount adds up to only RM12.0 billion, only 10.7% of committed investments in the SDC have been realized. Where is the rest 90% of the committed investors?
3. Development of valuable and high quality youth and human capital – Where the well paid jobs in Sabah? Even pay jobs are not available. This is why so many young Sabahans are working in the Klang Valley and Johor.
4. Eradication of poverty and improve quality of life – Visit CM's constituency to see plenty of poverty and only his cronies have a good life!
5. Achieved balanced regional development. Except Kota Kinabalu, there is hardly any development. Balanced development does not exist at all!
Not only 5 objectives of this budget doomed to fail. Datuk Musa has no strategy to accelerate economic development for Sabahans, expedite the growth of higher income for Sabahans and innovate the economy of Sabah.
Datuk CM has been too long as the Minister of Finance – the style of his budget is the same every year. There is absolutely no innovation. The worse is that there is no diversification of sources of revenue.
The BN Sabah 2013 budget is boring and has nothing for Sabahans nathing to be happy about becouse......
Datuk speaker
Even though Sabah received praise from the Auditor General, there is no denying that Sabah’s state debt has increased significantly over the past years and now stands at a worryingly high level. Even though state revenue has increased by 236% from RM1.78b in 2005 to RM4.20b in 2010, .....state debt has increased by an even higher rate from RM1b in 2005.. to... RM3.1 in 2010, an increase of 310%.
This prompted the following statement from the Malaysian Ratings Agency at the end of 2011:
‘Despite Sabah’s favorable financial standing in 2010, the state’s public debt was rising at a faster clip of 30.6% in 2010, owing to bond issuances amounting to RM544 million as well as new loans granted by the federal government totaling RM168.0 million during the year. As a result, public debt stock as a percentage of total revenue remained elevated at 73.9% in 2010 (2009: 77.9%).
However, the rapid rise in the debt level may yield legitimate concerns on the state’s ability to repay its liabilities, particularly when the amount of cash balances available in smaller than the size of public debt.
As a result of this rapid increase in debt, debt servicing charges has also increased significantly. For example, debt serving charges amounted to RM92m in 2010 but was projected to increase to RM145m in 2012, an increase of 57.6% in just two years. As a basis for comparison, government revenue was projected to increase by only 22.5% from RM3304m in 2010 to RM4048m in 2012.
Furthermore, according to the 2011 Auditor General Report, Sabah experienced the largest absolute fall in its Consolidated Funds, from RM2.82b to RM2.66b, a fall of RM156.7m, among all the states in Malaysia!
The fact that much of this debt and reduction of Consolidated Funds shows that:
(i) the state government was not prudent in using its budget surpluses for development expenditure;
(ii) the state government was not prudent in minimizing the costs of projects by open tender...
(iii) the federal government has not played its part in properly funding development projects in the state.
*****Development Benefits Cronies***
Yes, there is GDP growth every year, but the average Sabahan continues to suffer more and more due to cost of living increases. For example, the people of Tawau suffers every day due to traffic jams in Jalan Apas, one of the major routes into and out of the town but the government still has no plans or allocations set aside to construct an outer ring road or a coastal highway.
But a new investment in Sg Burung, Balung, Sipadan Mangrove Resort, located 25km from the junction, has been approved by the Public Private Partnership Unit or UKAS (Urussetia Kerjasama Awam Swasta) and this involves an allocation of RM47 Million to build a tar road for the purposes of benefitting a single resort!
Let us pick another nearer example, the new 1km road to this assembly hall. JKR has announced that the cost was RM14.9 million just for 1km distance! can the minister of Infrastructure explain what make it so expensive to construct this 1 km 2 hala rd which normally costs 2 million?
This highlights the true meaning of what the BN means by Janji Ditepati … tetapi untuk kroni. In the 80’s the government promise to build 4 mile (10 KM) of coastal highway in Tawau but until now is still not fulfilled
And now the government promise to build a coastal highway to Kudat. believve me.. I don’t think this promise will be ever fulfilled ....even in 100 years of BN ruling.
Tuan speaker,
Concentration of power tends to corrupt
The Ministry of Finance’s allocation has skyrocketed from RM737m in 2008 to RM1.87b in next year, a 263% increase. The combined expenditure of the Chief Minister’s Department and the Ministry of Finance is RM2.59b, constituting 63.4% of the 2013 budget.
Well, thanks to position as Huguan Siou, Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri Pairin still holds the second highest allocation through his portfolio as Minister of Infrastructure Development with RM560.6m allocated in the 2013 budget. Yet we are not seeing any significant improvement in terms of the overall infrastructure in the state, most notable the road infrastructure especially in the rural areas. The Merdeka Center poll results show that the perception of poor infrastructure is the prevailing point of view among a majority of Sabahans. I am confident that if a approval ratings were to be taken for Tan Sri Pairin, it would not be too different with that of his boss, CM Musa.
The over concentration of the allocations in the hands of the two ministries controlled by the Chief Minister is a reflection of the over concentration of power in the hands of certain UMNO leaders in the state government. The low approval ratings currently enjoyed by the CM is testament that much of this money has not been spent in a way which has benefitted the people of Sabah but instead has enriched a few cronies, mostly those who are closely associated with CM .
Datuk CM enough is enough. We want real development for our state and real infrastructure improvement. We do not want to have development that only benefits a select few and high allocations given for infrastructure projects, many of which seldom see the light of day.
***Comparing the PR and BN budget***
Even though we in the opposition do not have the same kind of political financing that UMNO receives, of which RM40m of smuggled cash in Hong Kong is just the tip of the iceberg, we are still able to contribute in proposing an exciting alternative budget for the state.
Just to remind the state representatives gathered here today, we in PR Sabah have prepared an alternative budget that promotes financial transparency and accountability, that decentralizes power from CM to the other ministry and local government, that reallocates expenditure away from the Ministry of Finance, that targets social assistance towards the marginalized and which channels much of the increase in oil royalties to infrastructure improvement as well as long term development projects that will distribute wealth and opportunities much more equitably. This is a clear demonstration that the resources of the state government can be allocated equitably, efficiently, effectively and transparently without jeopardizing the state’s financial standing.
As the Pakatan Rakyat budget, which was announced on 17 October, has shown, there is little chance that the BN’s budget can compare with ours, on the simple basis that PR has pledged to increase the oil royalty allocated to Sabah from the current 5% to 20%!
Dear ketuan Mentri you should perhaps go and seek an appointment with PM Najib in Putrajaya to review the oil royalty and copy PR Sabah’s policy proposals in our budget since there is little chance the BN can come up with a better one.
We will not stop the BN state government from copying our proposals since this will benefit the people of Sabah. I know it is not easy for CM Musa to admit that he needs to learn from us. But at the very least he should consider my following recommendations.
And if you do not want to become the next opposition leader in this Dewan, please follow my advice and take these actions, most notably by asking for more oil royalties from BN federal government in order to compete with us in PR Sabah. If not, you will no doubt regret your lack of actions taken.
****Loss of Compensation
We want to draw attention to a failed promise of the BN government in seeking just compensation from the Federal government for the loss of revenue from revoking the import and excise duties on petroleum products.
This was carried out in 2001 and as promised by the then CM, Datuk Osu Sukam, the Sabah state government would seek RM250m compensation from the Federal Government. But according to the budgets in the previous years as well as the latest 2013 budget, the compensation paid by the Federal government is only RM120m! This means that the Sabah state government has effectively lost RM130m in revenue a year and total RM1.56 billion over the past 12 years!
Not only is the Sabah State government powerless in increasing the oil royalty, they cannot even get the Federal government to pay us Sabahans the proper compensation from lost revenue from the lifting of the excise and import taxes for petroleum products. Perhaps CM proves me wrong by his actions given his close relationship with Prime Minister Najib and his wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.
Conclusion
Lastly, my two cents advice for our CM is, please stop practicing corruption! We Pakatan Rakyat confident to cut down 24% out of non fixed operational expenditure once we are voted in government.
If Sabah BN government has been free of corruption, like PR states of Penang and Selangor, Sabah will have higher income, more job opportunities, and zero poverty!
But now, our Chief Minister, Musa Aman, who has been the focus of an international investigation involving allegations of money laundering via Swiss bank accounts in Hong Kong and Switzerland.
This matter has been raised in parliament and was confirmed by the Minister of Prime Minister Department that investigation is done which found that “no elements of corruption” involved and all the RM40 million is the donation to Sabah UMNO.
As you can ask any ordinary man in the street, nobody will be
so stupid to believe it. I hereby urge the CM to clarify on this serious issue:
1. Why did the money brought in or smuggled in Hong Kong airport in Singapore Dollar?
2. Why can’t Michael Chia just TT the money to Sabah UMNO’s account?
3. How can you CM pretend not knowing Mr Michael if he is your donor?
Dear CM, can you swear that the money received is not illegal and you tell the honorable hall today. I know you do not dare to do so. But I am sincere to help to clear your name, by signing Power of Attorney letter, endorsing the criminal complaint by the Bruno Manser Fund (BMF) to allow the Swiss government to investigate UBS AG Bank over the alleged money-laundering on behalf of sabah chief minister.
Thank you
Datuk Speaker,
Sekali lagi saya mohon tidak sokong Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan (2013) kerana ia langsung tidak dapat membantu rakyat Sabah.
Sekian, terima kasih.
YB Wong Sze Phin @ Jimmy
ADUN N.57 Sri Tanjong
Mesyuarat Ketiga
Penggal Ke 5
19 Okt 2012- 25 Okt 2012
Speech by:
YB Wong Sze Phin @ Jimmy ADUN N.57 Sri Tanjong
Tuan Speaker
Terima kasih kerana memberi saya peluang untuk membahaskan Pembentangan Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan (2013) yang disampaikan oleh Yang Amat Berhormat Ketua Menteri pada 19 Oktober 2012.
Salam Bersih, Salam Ubah dan salam bersidang kepada semua Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri Sabah. Ini kalilah.
Tuan Speaker
Saya akan membaca ucapan saya dalam Bahasa Inggeris.
Tuan Speaker,
Before I begin my debate on the proposed State Budget 2013, I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate our Chief Minister YAB Datuk Seri Musa Aman. He is the best ever Chief Minister since BN took control of the Sabah state government in 1994 for two reasons.
1. The Sabah Development Corridor (SDC) has achieved its best performance by receiving RM10 billion in the first half of this year, the highest amount of private investments among all the states in Malaysia.
2. Sabah has yet again earned praise from Auditor-General Tan Sri Ambrin Buang for demonstrating sound financial management in 2011 in terms of maintaining its record of efficient and prudent financial management over the past few years.
But at the same time, I cannot help but feel sorry for our CM. After doing such a good job for the state of Sabah, his approval rating among the rakyat has droped from 60% to only 45%, according to the latest polls by Merdeka Center earlier this month. This means that less than half of all Sabahans approve of his performance despite the heavy drumming up of his many achievements in the mainstream media.
CM Datuk Musa, if I was in your position, I would immediately dissolve the state assembly and call for the state elections to prove that a majority of Sabahans still support your leadership. There is no need to wait for Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib, to decide when to call the next general election. Our dear CM, I hereby challenge you to dissolve the state assembly after the tabling of this budget in order to prove your reputation is the best ever CM of Sabah!
However, I don't think you dare accept my challenge. You are still dreaming and placing false hopes on this newly tabled, so called the best ever budget, to regain the support from the people. For now, we bring the focus back on the budget which you tabled last Friday.
What is about BN state budget?
The CM cum Minister of Finance in his budget speech said Sabah is grateful to Federal Government for the allocation for Sabah. In fact, I feel nothing to be grateful about, due to the very fact that 2013 Federal Budget is one of the worst for Sabah in the last 10 years, receiving only RM3 billion which is 6.5% out of total development expenditure, whereas our population is 11.6% of this country’s population.
CM’s logic that there is a lot of development or that Sabahans have benefitted just because he has been and is going to spend large amount of the state money or how quickly he can spend it! This is all worng!!! Most of the money in previous budgets has produced little benefit for the people of Sabah. Judging from the poor records of the BN Sabah government, Pakatan is confident that the 2013 state budget will have nothing to shout about.
......Bad management and corruption have continued to keep many Sabahan’s under the poverty line.
Sabah is still the poorest state in Malaysia, hundreds of thousands of Sabahans are working in poorly paid jobs in the Klang Valley, Johor and Penang. Poverty can be seen everywhere within 5km from the centre of Kota Kinabalu! Datuk CM’s own constituency has many poverty stricken Sabahans! What have all the so called good budgets of Datuk Musa done for his own constituents?
Datuk Musa has made too many boosts on the comments from the Auditor General. Behind the façade of so called good management of certain departments, he needs to be reminded of the rampant corruption, deep rooted poverty, bad delivery service, high cost of living and---- his inability to abolish the Cabotage Policy.
Auditor General Report on Sabah concerning old folks home where residents at these homes were sleeping with mosquitoes, bathing with cold water, not fed beyond 5pm and made to eat food that they could not chew or were bad for them. Is this the practice of a government who claim ----“Rakyat didahulukan?”
Therefore, the few departments that have received praises from the Auditor General have done nothing for Sabahans.
--**-Failed Objectives and No Strategy-**
Sabah is an under developed state. We need to improve our very outdated and inadequate infrastructure. Some BN politicians have said, I won Sri Tanjung with the help of the incompetent SESB, Jabatan Air, JKR and Majlis Perbandaran Tawau. Yes, this is indeed true.
What has government done in this regard? Of the 6 objectives of this and previous budgets, the Sabah Bn government, 5 have failed to miserably:
1. Improve infrastructure – Sabah still has the worst;
2. Acceleration of achievement of Halatuju – no result as the 2012/2013 Economic Report pointed out, the cumulative committed investment from launch date of the SDC until end of June this year is RM112.0 billion but the actual realised investment amount adds up to only RM12.0 billion, only 10.7% of committed investments in the SDC have been realized. Where is the rest 90% of the committed investors?
3. Development of valuable and high quality youth and human capital – Where the well paid jobs in Sabah? Even pay jobs are not available. This is why so many young Sabahans are working in the Klang Valley and Johor.
4. Eradication of poverty and improve quality of life – Visit CM's constituency to see plenty of poverty and only his cronies have a good life!
5. Achieved balanced regional development. Except Kota Kinabalu, there is hardly any development. Balanced development does not exist at all!
Not only 5 objectives of this budget doomed to fail. Datuk Musa has no strategy to accelerate economic development for Sabahans, expedite the growth of higher income for Sabahans and innovate the economy of Sabah.
Datuk CM has been too long as the Minister of Finance – the style of his budget is the same every year. There is absolutely no innovation. The worse is that there is no diversification of sources of revenue.
The BN Sabah 2013 budget is boring and has nothing for Sabahans nathing to be happy about becouse......
Datuk speaker
Even though Sabah received praise from the Auditor General, there is no denying that Sabah’s state debt has increased significantly over the past years and now stands at a worryingly high level. Even though state revenue has increased by 236% from RM1.78b in 2005 to RM4.20b in 2010, .....state debt has increased by an even higher rate from RM1b in 2005.. to... RM3.1 in 2010, an increase of 310%.
This prompted the following statement from the Malaysian Ratings Agency at the end of 2011:
‘Despite Sabah’s favorable financial standing in 2010, the state’s public debt was rising at a faster clip of 30.6% in 2010, owing to bond issuances amounting to RM544 million as well as new loans granted by the federal government totaling RM168.0 million during the year. As a result, public debt stock as a percentage of total revenue remained elevated at 73.9% in 2010 (2009: 77.9%).
However, the rapid rise in the debt level may yield legitimate concerns on the state’s ability to repay its liabilities, particularly when the amount of cash balances available in smaller than the size of public debt.
As a result of this rapid increase in debt, debt servicing charges has also increased significantly. For example, debt serving charges amounted to RM92m in 2010 but was projected to increase to RM145m in 2012, an increase of 57.6% in just two years. As a basis for comparison, government revenue was projected to increase by only 22.5% from RM3304m in 2010 to RM4048m in 2012.
Furthermore, according to the 2011 Auditor General Report, Sabah experienced the largest absolute fall in its Consolidated Funds, from RM2.82b to RM2.66b, a fall of RM156.7m, among all the states in Malaysia!
The fact that much of this debt and reduction of Consolidated Funds shows that:
(i) the state government was not prudent in using its budget surpluses for development expenditure;
(ii) the state government was not prudent in minimizing the costs of projects by open tender...
(iii) the federal government has not played its part in properly funding development projects in the state.
*****Development Benefits Cronies***
Yes, there is GDP growth every year, but the average Sabahan continues to suffer more and more due to cost of living increases. For example, the people of Tawau suffers every day due to traffic jams in Jalan Apas, one of the major routes into and out of the town but the government still has no plans or allocations set aside to construct an outer ring road or a coastal highway.
But a new investment in Sg Burung, Balung, Sipadan Mangrove Resort, located 25km from the junction, has been approved by the Public Private Partnership Unit or UKAS (Urussetia Kerjasama Awam Swasta) and this involves an allocation of RM47 Million to build a tar road for the purposes of benefitting a single resort!
Let us pick another nearer example, the new 1km road to this assembly hall. JKR has announced that the cost was RM14.9 million just for 1km distance! can the minister of Infrastructure explain what make it so expensive to construct this 1 km 2 hala rd which normally costs 2 million?
This highlights the true meaning of what the BN means by Janji Ditepati … tetapi untuk kroni. In the 80’s the government promise to build 4 mile (10 KM) of coastal highway in Tawau but until now is still not fulfilled
And now the government promise to build a coastal highway to Kudat. believve me.. I don’t think this promise will be ever fulfilled ....even in 100 years of BN ruling.
Tuan speaker,
Concentration of power tends to corrupt
The Ministry of Finance’s allocation has skyrocketed from RM737m in 2008 to RM1.87b in next year, a 263% increase. The combined expenditure of the Chief Minister’s Department and the Ministry of Finance is RM2.59b, constituting 63.4% of the 2013 budget.
Well, thanks to position as Huguan Siou, Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri Pairin still holds the second highest allocation through his portfolio as Minister of Infrastructure Development with RM560.6m allocated in the 2013 budget. Yet we are not seeing any significant improvement in terms of the overall infrastructure in the state, most notable the road infrastructure especially in the rural areas. The Merdeka Center poll results show that the perception of poor infrastructure is the prevailing point of view among a majority of Sabahans. I am confident that if a approval ratings were to be taken for Tan Sri Pairin, it would not be too different with that of his boss, CM Musa.
The over concentration of the allocations in the hands of the two ministries controlled by the Chief Minister is a reflection of the over concentration of power in the hands of certain UMNO leaders in the state government. The low approval ratings currently enjoyed by the CM is testament that much of this money has not been spent in a way which has benefitted the people of Sabah but instead has enriched a few cronies, mostly those who are closely associated with CM .
Datuk CM enough is enough. We want real development for our state and real infrastructure improvement. We do not want to have development that only benefits a select few and high allocations given for infrastructure projects, many of which seldom see the light of day.
***Comparing the PR and BN budget***
Even though we in the opposition do not have the same kind of political financing that UMNO receives, of which RM40m of smuggled cash in Hong Kong is just the tip of the iceberg, we are still able to contribute in proposing an exciting alternative budget for the state.
Just to remind the state representatives gathered here today, we in PR Sabah have prepared an alternative budget that promotes financial transparency and accountability, that decentralizes power from CM to the other ministry and local government, that reallocates expenditure away from the Ministry of Finance, that targets social assistance towards the marginalized and which channels much of the increase in oil royalties to infrastructure improvement as well as long term development projects that will distribute wealth and opportunities much more equitably. This is a clear demonstration that the resources of the state government can be allocated equitably, efficiently, effectively and transparently without jeopardizing the state’s financial standing.
As the Pakatan Rakyat budget, which was announced on 17 October, has shown, there is little chance that the BN’s budget can compare with ours, on the simple basis that PR has pledged to increase the oil royalty allocated to Sabah from the current 5% to 20%!
Dear ketuan Mentri you should perhaps go and seek an appointment with PM Najib in Putrajaya to review the oil royalty and copy PR Sabah’s policy proposals in our budget since there is little chance the BN can come up with a better one.
We will not stop the BN state government from copying our proposals since this will benefit the people of Sabah. I know it is not easy for CM Musa to admit that he needs to learn from us. But at the very least he should consider my following recommendations.
And if you do not want to become the next opposition leader in this Dewan, please follow my advice and take these actions, most notably by asking for more oil royalties from BN federal government in order to compete with us in PR Sabah. If not, you will no doubt regret your lack of actions taken.
****Loss of Compensation
We want to draw attention to a failed promise of the BN government in seeking just compensation from the Federal government for the loss of revenue from revoking the import and excise duties on petroleum products.
This was carried out in 2001 and as promised by the then CM, Datuk Osu Sukam, the Sabah state government would seek RM250m compensation from the Federal Government. But according to the budgets in the previous years as well as the latest 2013 budget, the compensation paid by the Federal government is only RM120m! This means that the Sabah state government has effectively lost RM130m in revenue a year and total RM1.56 billion over the past 12 years!
Not only is the Sabah State government powerless in increasing the oil royalty, they cannot even get the Federal government to pay us Sabahans the proper compensation from lost revenue from the lifting of the excise and import taxes for petroleum products. Perhaps CM proves me wrong by his actions given his close relationship with Prime Minister Najib and his wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.
Conclusion
Lastly, my two cents advice for our CM is, please stop practicing corruption! We Pakatan Rakyat confident to cut down 24% out of non fixed operational expenditure once we are voted in government.
If Sabah BN government has been free of corruption, like PR states of Penang and Selangor, Sabah will have higher income, more job opportunities, and zero poverty!
But now, our Chief Minister, Musa Aman, who has been the focus of an international investigation involving allegations of money laundering via Swiss bank accounts in Hong Kong and Switzerland.
This matter has been raised in parliament and was confirmed by the Minister of Prime Minister Department that investigation is done which found that “no elements of corruption” involved and all the RM40 million is the donation to Sabah UMNO.
As you can ask any ordinary man in the street, nobody will be
so stupid to believe it. I hereby urge the CM to clarify on this serious issue:
1. Why did the money brought in or smuggled in Hong Kong airport in Singapore Dollar?
2. Why can’t Michael Chia just TT the money to Sabah UMNO’s account?
3. How can you CM pretend not knowing Mr Michael if he is your donor?
Dear CM, can you swear that the money received is not illegal and you tell the honorable hall today. I know you do not dare to do so. But I am sincere to help to clear your name, by signing Power of Attorney letter, endorsing the criminal complaint by the Bruno Manser Fund (BMF) to allow the Swiss government to investigate UBS AG Bank over the alleged money-laundering on behalf of sabah chief minister.
Thank you
Datuk Speaker,
Sekali lagi saya mohon tidak sokong Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan (2013) kerana ia langsung tidak dapat membantu rakyat Sabah.
Sekian, terima kasih.
YB Wong Sze Phin @ Jimmy
ADUN N.57 Sri Tanjong
民主行動黨州議員黃仕平遭驅離州議會
沙巴進步黨的兩名議員即里卡士區州議員拿督劉德泉和路陽區州議員謝秋菊為了表示同仇敵愾,也陪同黃氏離席以示抗議。
州議長拿督沙里賽德昨午在硝煙瀰漫的氣氛中,再度驅逐民主行動黨籍斯里丹絨區州議員黃仕平出州議會,並飭令他在接下來兩天本次會議也不得到場!
他是因為黃氏於早前參與辯論明年度沙巴財政預算案時不斷抨擊國陣州政府涉及貪污,並諭令黃氏收回指控不果後作此決定。
他原本祗是禁止黃氏禁足州議會一天,惟因黃氏不遵照離場,而在副首席部長拿督耶耶胡申動議下進行不記名表決後,而有了該項沙巴州議會有史以來最嚴重懲罰。
沙巴進步黨的兩名議員即里卡士區州議員拿督劉德泉和路陽區州議員謝秋菊為了表示同仇敵愾,也陪同黃氏離席以示抗議。
沙巴進步黨的兩名議員即里卡士區州議員拿督劉德泉和路陽區州議員謝秋菊為了表示同仇敵愾,也陪同黃氏離席以示抗議。
這已是州議長第二次向黃仕平發出禁足令,在今年三月間的年度首次議會中,黃氏因不聽取議長指示而遭到對付。
較早時,也是沙巴民行黨主席的黃氏在辯論時已多次揭露州政府濫權和貪污,已引起了眾國陣議員的不滿,進而引發雙方嚴重口角;耶耶也起立要求州議長警告或採取行動對付頑固不靈的黃氏。
儘管遭到後座議員如西江區州議員拿督三蘇丁和布加雅區州議員拿督蘭里等人的挑釁和指罵,黃氏曾一度收回「貪污」字眼,可是後來還是依然不斷批評政府貪污,導致耶耶怒提議會常規第五十一條文,要求州議長採取行動對付有關不聽勸告的後座議員。
隨著耶耶正式提出了這項臨時動議,沙里則尋求眾議員表決,獲得佔了議會九成的國陣議員皆異口同聲支持這項動議,州議長就宣諭黃氏馬上離開州議會大廳,直至今日會議完畢為止。
可是,僅辯論到中途的黃氏卻不想因而就範,繼續在座位上不滿地說:「沙巴民主已死!」,「這樣對付我,國陣肯定會輸!」,雖然州議長再次「請」他出去,黃氏依然抗議不走。
鑑於此,州議長無可奈何下惟有宣佈採取最嚴厲的懲罰,指稱黃氏不聽從其勸告,正式發出不可參與接下來議會的禁足令。
黃氏在離開州議會後接受報界訪問時直指這是州議會有史以來最黑暗的一天。
他說,這是國陣政府無法接受被指貪污的批評,所以才向他下逐客令,「為甚麼國陣對別人提到貪污那麼敏感?」
他形容,州議會只有三位反對黨議員,可謂是勢單力薄,所以只有面對被逐出的結果,所以希望來屆大選人民能夠給反對黨更多的機會。
黃氏乃進行了約五十分鐘的辯論,他說,他一再受到國陣一眾議員的攻擊,以致他祗說了一半的話,尚有許多關係人民權益的課題未能申張。
在回答一項問題時,他說,若果有機會的話,他希望州議長撤回其禁足令。
他笑言隨著他的離開後,國陣後座議員必然「感到寂寞,且會很掛念我」。
提到劉德泉謝秋菊陪他一同離場時,他說,他指這反映反對黨反抗不公平採取一條心的立場。
黃仕平直指預算案分配不均
民主行動黨籍斯里丹絨區州議員黃仕平昨日在州議會直指首席部長拿督慕沙阿曼提呈的明年度沙巴財政預算案只顧朋黨利益,各部門所獲撥款分配不均。
他表示,從二零零八年以來,由慕沙兼掌的首長署和財政部佔了預算案的六十三點四巴仙銷預算,剩餘的三成多才撥給其他部門。
他說:「本來這兩個部門只佔五成的預算,可是明年的預算已漲到六成多,掌握廿五億九千多萬元,而且財政部的款項就已從二零零八年的七億三千七百萬元調高至十八億七千萬元,其漲幅高達二百六十三巴仙。」
黃仕平是在參與明年度州財政預算案辯論時指出,這可看出預算案的撥款並沒有惠及沙巴人民,相反的只惠益了與首長密切聯繫的朋黨而己。
他說,更驚人的是,除了「嘉杜民族英雄」丹斯里佐瑟百林掌管的基本設施發展部可獲得較多撥款之外,也只有巫統的內閣部長才享有高額的預算,反觀三位華裔部長的部門所獲少得可憐。
他指出,這可看出預算案的撥款並沒有惠及沙巴人民,相反的只惠益了與首長密切聯繫的朋黨而己。
無論如何,黃氏指出,百林的基本設施發展部縱然在這次預算案中獲得第二多撥款,但本州整體的基設水平尤其是郊區的道路並沒有明顯的改善。
他形容,人民希望是看到實質上的發展,能夠給予全州各地建設有全面性的發展,而不是只給予一些選擇性計劃,讓很多沙巴人民看不曙光。
他說,其在過去的預算案中,人民受益甚淺,沙巴依然是緩慢發展州屬,而這乃是因身兼州財政部長的首長在位太久,而致每年的預算案千篇一律,毫無創新,最差勁的是稅收方面
黃氏指出,據二零一一年度總稽查司報告顯示,州庫銳減一億五千六百七十萬元,而這足以顯示州政府並無謹慎地使用收益來發展沙巴、妥善分配資金推動州內發展計劃,以及沒以公開招標方式來降低計劃的成本。
2012年10月18日 星期四
黃仕平籲人民改朝換代支持民聯執政
民主行動黨沙巴州主席也是斯裡丹絨州議員黃仕平
民主行動黨沙巴州主席,也是斯裡丹絨州議員的黃仕平籲請斗湖的人民要改朝換代支持民聯執政,並強調,民聯政府肯定的會視斗湖為「親骨兒」給於豐衣足食得溫飽。
他猛烈抨擊國陣把斗湖國會議席視為「孤兒選區」,不但是一個不負責任的做法,更是在輕視和侮辱斗湖人的智慧,讓同樣是納稅人的斗湖人更看清國陣的面貌和處事作風。
他指出,國陣成員黨之一的自由民主黨黨主席拿督劉偉強於本月十四日在斗湖舉行的四區聯合代表大會上致詞時說:斗湖國會議席巳逐漸成為「孤兒選區」,在過去兩三年的民生問題增多,發展相應緩慢的只靠州議員撥款解決,自該席變成反對黨議員只能靠嘴吧來發表意見而無法用行動來解決問題。
黃仕平說:「劉偉強也是首相署副部長,因此,他的言論是直接代表著國陣政府和首相,也很清楚的在告訴斗湖人,國陣是在懲罰斗湖人,一點也不珍惜斗湖且把她拋棄成為「孤兒」,我們斗湖人可以從劉副部長的談話看清國陣政府不尊重人民的意願和抉擇,他們一直在強調斯裡丹絨的選民和許多斗湖國會區的選民把手中一票投給反對黨是錯誤的,而在懲罰斗湖人不給於發展,由國陣的成員黨經常強調斗湖沒有發展足可証明之。」
他說,斗湖是州內第三大市鎮,也是州內華人較多地區,而劉偉強則對擁有斗湖國席的進步黨退出國陣以表示遺憾,並說國會議員雖是華人,但斗湖華社及國會中失去強而有力的傳聲筒。
黃氏指出,劉偉強的話也讓斗湖人看出國陣在斗湖的無能和絲毫沒作用,只因華裔國會議席不是國陣所有,華社便在政府和國會中失去力量,那請問在斗湖的國陣華基政黨是否形同虛設,而國陣的他族國州議員難道只為自己的族群而非為整個地區的人民服務。
黃仕平說:「國陣既然視斗湖為孤兒,我們只有自力更生的去尋求一個新的希望,在來屆大選中全力去支持民聯執政的改朝換代,我們不能做他人的孤兒,我在此作出強烈和堅定的保証,民聯政府一定重視斗湖為「親骨兒」給於良好照顧到豐衣足食得溫飽。」
2012年10月17日 星期三
商家指人行道柱子影響生意
斗湖市區回教堂路路旁部分已經安插好的行人道柱子。
斗湖市議會受促停止在市區回教堂路的商業店前面安插行人道柱子,因為這將影響商業店門面生意,同時亦妨礙商家上卸貨物。
民主行動黨沙巴宣傳主任及該黨斗湖公共投訴主任陳利發,是今午巡視了回教堂路哈芝沙禮支路(Lorong Haji Salleh)行人道柱子的安插工程,表示市議會必須考慮到商業店的門面生意,尤其是投訴者關先生經營的五金店需要店門前空間上卸貨物,在其店前安插一排柱子是不適當的。
據關先生指出,日後行人道柱子安插完成,車輛便無法短暫的停泊在店前,這難道車輛包括羅裡,都要停在馬路央上卸貨物嗎?
他繼稱,其五金店在該處已經營超過30年,向來相安無事。他促請市議會相關部門擬定美化工程之前,應該站在商家立場設想。況且目前生意難做,連店前五加基短暫性的停車空間也遭到剝奪,使得生意量更加雪上加霜。
陳泓縑及陳利發表示市議會必須重新檢討有關美化工程,更應停止在該路段設置多此一舉的行人道柱子,尤其是在車水馬龍的商業店門前,況且斗湖市區交通已是非常擁擠,市議會在無法增添停車位的舉措下,卻建造柱子蠶食原有可以用來停車上卸貨物的路旁空間,這實在是說不過去的。
他們表示,市議會應該善於使用馬路空間來增加更多停車位,如關先生經營的五金店門前約有七米長的空間,不應該鋪上磚塊,如果能夠改建可以增加數個停車位,何樂而不為之?
民行黨捐五百片鋅片予災民
黃仕平州議員移交鋅片予災黎合攝。
民主行動黨西裡丹絨區州議員黃仕平今移交五百鋅片予日前在亞拔士路三哩半好景園後甘邦武吉火患災黎。
他乃在特別助理陳利發陪同下移交上述鋅片。
他表示,該區災黎向他要求一千五百鋅片,經善心人士的捐助今特先移交五百片,歡迎善心人士能捐助板料鋅片或現金以便協助該處災黎早日重建家園。
他說,該處有十三間木屋,每間約需一百二十片鋅片,每間約有七至八人口或十人一家,最重要先給予鋅片讓一些人有遮陰擋雨之處。
他表示感謝善心人士捐助鋅片並呼籲公眾踴躍捐獻建屋材料或現金以協助災黎重建家園。
有意捐獻者可聯絡(一)民主行動黨斗湖辦事處089-715717(二)陳利發,019-8533683(三)黃仕平州議員016-8260108。
訂閱:
文章 (Atom)



